Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smetz Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Smetz Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per source searches, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. North America1000 06:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - non-notable as a record label. No indication label has had any impact on musical culture, musical genres, or the development of notable artists.   78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 15:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Bobherry  Talk   Edits  13:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and per 78.26 could not find anything notable about this music label.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.