Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smile Kids Jr. with TeenNick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Smile Kids Jr. with TeenNick

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unreferenced, with no evidence of notability, and BEFORE search finds nothing of substance. Previously draftified and PRODded, but creating editor didn't like any of it, so here we are. Fails WP:GNG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: no evidence of satisfying basic notability, either with BEFORE or not. Looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON, assuming it will be notable in the future. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 20:09, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is not enough evidence for it's notability. Agreed by Schminnte. CastJared (talk) 00:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Found no significant coverage of the subject. The creator and the major contributors (Qu22zz, 63.238.58.110 and 96.249.248.109) dedicated most, if not all, of their contributions to the article. Clearly created for promotional reason. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 00:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - With no references, fails verifiability as well as notability. As a planned television show rather than an actual television show, too soon applies.  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete A. As an avid Nickelodeon editor, can confirm it is entirely fake, and B. Clearly more socking of Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremiah Caquias. Magitroopa (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: No coverage, no existence, pretty much all the major contributors are socks — no reason to keep this in any namespace. Frankly, this could easily fall under at least G3, and probably G5 as well (I'd be surprised if creator was't just more IP socking by Jeremiah Caquias), assuming it doesn't end up snowing first.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Lacks notability and in addition, 'move-warring'. Eagleash (talk) 04:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.