Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smile Solutions Training Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Smile Solutions Training Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable institution. Exempt from A7 deletion by virtue of being a vocational school, but unlike some other educational institutions, such schools are not inherently notable. No sources found which would enable a pass of WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 13:18, 8 June 2012 (UTC) It is an educational institution and is definitely verifiable a simple Google Search would show 6 pages of results for this particular institution. It can also be verified on Google maps. whistlerworks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whistlerworks (talk • contribs) 16:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes, it definitely exists.  The first six pages of Google results certainly testify to that.  None, however, is an arm's-length third-party source of expert opinion stating that the organization in question is of any merit or notability.  Indeed, I could find nothing beyond directory-style listings.  Notability is neither asserted nor documentable.  Ubelowme (talk) 17:56, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per CSD A7 as I had previously nominated. This is not a mainstream education facility, it is a business, as I had confirmed here, prior to nominating a verbatim copy of this article with a slightly different name. Labelled as an "ad" in the creator's opening edit summary, this is also a case of CSD G11 spam. The nominator should not have removed the CSD tag, and this article should not be wasting time and resources at AfD. -- WikHead (talk) 19:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Generally vocational schools need external accreditation or to pass GNG to be notable. OSborn arfcontribs. 01:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Wait Because it is verifiable and it is a educational institution, I say just wait a few week and see if this does not pick up any reliable sources or maybe add it to a list of vocational colleges in Oklahoma. james4761 arfcontribs. 09:11, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.