Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smileghost (Innyume)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing based on early consensus. Missvain (talk) 01:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Smileghost (Innyume)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Computer game, insufficient evidence that topic meets Wikipedia's high standards of WP:Notability. MOST computer games do not. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  04:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  04:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 05:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Engr.  Smitty   Werben 05:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Appears to totally fail WP:GNG per nom. However the "most computer games are not notable" was unnecessary, not only is it wrong but also gives the appearance of WP:IDONTLIKEIT.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:23, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing here that indicates the WP:GNG. (Not because of the “most computer games aren’t notable” argument though - I don’t agree with that notion at all. Hopefully the nom meant something more like most amateur fan games or something? That could at least be argued.) Sergecross73   msg me  14:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe if the article had actual citations to newspapers, magazines or other publications, I'd judge it. This is just an unsourced mess. From what I gather, it's a 5 yr old, Japanese-language computer game. Regional impact at best. Oaktree b (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero hits in WP:VG/SE is already a good indication for lacking notability. The article exclusively uses WP:USERG content as sources (either via YouTube or Niconico). IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 14:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - article just doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 00:32, 20 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.