Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smith & Wesson Performance Center Model 460XVR Hunter 14" muzzle brake barrel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Moved to Smith & Wesson Model 460XVR, DroneZone indef blocked. Tim Vickers (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Smith &amp; Wesson Performance Center Model 460XVR Hunter 14&quot; muzzle brake barrel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The Smith & Wesson Performance Center Model 460XVR Hunter 14" muzzle brake barrel is a modification of the Smith & Wesson Model 460XVR, and should be described in the article of its parent weapon, not in an article of its own. And the name is just too freaking long! Ops101ex (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MediaMob (talk) 05:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure, man, but this article is not for A revolver, it is for the most powerful one of this caliber, and since there is no article for the standard variant of the revolver (which by the way i'm sure you don't know how exactly to name, maybe except you) don't talk about deletion, it's silly ! And the name, i'm not gonna put it in your pocket body ! It's the same as it was with the HK417 - many of you wanted to merge it with the HK416, right. You people live for this. You don't understand the food not intended for your minds. I hate mediocrity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DroneZone (talk • contribs)


 * Merge/Delete Does a Pontiac Firefly Turbo deserve its own page because it's "the most powerful of" its model? BMW  (drive)  12:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge with Smith & Wesson Model 460XVR, has information that could be used in the main article, which is notable Scratch that and Delete. Main article does not even have an article. Red  Thunder  12:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * What's goin' on here man. I can't even finish and send my stuff. I was saying, about the joke you made for the Pontiac, that i specified that there was no article for the standard variant. So, make an article for the Smith & Wesson Model 460XVR, mention mine in it an made an internal link, don't wish for its deletion.  About the signing, i dont know where to sign what. Childish game it is. Not a database.  Or you can just make an article for the Standard variant and inside we'll find the plase for "the most powerfull" variant.  Here's my sign : DroneZone. There.  User:DroneZone. That better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  DroneZone (talk • contribs)


 * Rename and expand per WP:BITE. Rename this to the base model, include this information within, and someone give DroneZone a hand with article expectations, shall we? Jclemens (talk) 17:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * JC, this is Jetwave Dave's newest sock puppet, not a newbie. He stole the image from Gunsamerica (linked it in the article) and is now trolling so he can lambast anybody who disagrees with him.  This is a poor attempt at a troll, not a real article.  See Dronezone's edits and compare them to Jetwave Dave, TheWatcherREME, etc. --Nukes4Tots (talk) 22:07, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Rename and expand, move to Smith & Wesson Model 460XVR. I would be willing to expand the article and reference it properly. &mdash;  Dan  MP5  03:55, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Vote changed to Rename and expand; ditto with above. Jclemens and  Dan  MP5 , I like your thinking.  I failed to notice the original article did not exist. Ops101ex (talk) 07:08, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

'''Jolly good work, men ! Very productive. First the article, now the image. What next. Nice campaign you picked up. Keep up the good work. Don't disappoint the kids who watch you ! DroneZone (talk) 11:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.