Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmokeLong Quarterly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ged UK  18:46, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

SmokeLong Quarterly

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

not sure what applies to magazines but WP:GNG in any case. hardly any coverage. . LibStar (talk) 13:53, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think this is very notable, hardly any coverage. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:10, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable online magazine. No coverage found except self-referential websites and non-reliable-source websites and blogs. Some awards are claimed, but they don't appear to be notable awards. --MelanieN (talk) 20:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.