Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smruthi venkat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will salt. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Smruthi venkat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fails WP:GNG. This source looks good but isn’t enough for WP:GNG. Furthermore, with less than 4 movies she certainly doesn’t satisfy WP:NACTOR Celestina007 14:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 14:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 14:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 14:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 14:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 14:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Salt Delete, It was earlier as Smruthi Venkat and still AfD is running at Articles for deletion/Smruthi Venkat. It was CSDed by one of its creators & deleted by with note "Restorers should note the in-progress afd". - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Even isn't sigcov. Mostly just direct quotations. - hako9 (talk) 18:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt both titles: the creator of this page has been perma-banned for repeated disruptive editing. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt - has only just been deleted and this article is no improvement Spiderone  08:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * This isn't a speedy. The creator wasn't blocked before creating the article (nor was his sockpuppet), so not a G5; and the previous AFD didn't run to completion, so not a G4.  The previous version was deleted because its author thought it should remain in draft; it had been moved into mainspace without his consent by the author of this version. —Cryptic 09:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not enough coverage. At all. EverybodyEdits (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom . --SalmanZ (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.