Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SnaKeBit3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by  as "(A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)". Non-admin closure — Frankie (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

SnaKeBit3

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. I cannot find information of SnaKeBit3 in multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from SnakeBit3 himself. Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 03:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I am also nominating the following related pages because of their association with the article in discussion:
 * Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 03:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 03:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 10.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  03:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 04:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - This article is clearly promotional. The band doesn't even have a website, and even that would not make it notable enough to keep. --Andrew (User:90) (talk) 06:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 09:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's no reliable sources out there to show notability. Everything I've found has been released by SnaKeBite3 or links back to a purchase page. It doesn't help that the only sources on the articles are all links to facebook, twitter, and a MP3 upload site- in other words, not a single one of them is usable to show notability. You can only use primary sources if there's multiple independent and reliable sources to back up the claims and when there's no sources.... well, it's a pretty obvious delete. I would recommend that you also add the articles DropZERO Games and DropZERO Florida. They were added by the same user and lacks sources to show how they're notable. It's very, VERY obvious that the editor is a single purpose account that is only here to add promotional articles. They might not be aware of the rules, but it's pretty clear what their intentions are.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I have added DropZERO Games and DropZERO Florida for deletion. Discussion here. Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 16:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I have also added a tfD for Template:SnaKeBit3. Discussion here.Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promo piece, lack of third party reliable sources, per above. Sergecross73   msg me   19:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - as spam per G11 and so tagged. ukexpat (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.