Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snacko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. Redirected afterwards per SO's comment. As a note, this article was also created (as a mere, non-military WP:DICDEF) in 2008 by User:SuperSnacko... - The Bushranger One ping only 00:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Snacko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, informal neologism/military position. Exactly one reliable source, which is a mere dictionary definition of the term as used in a training squadron; no indication that this is a term (or even an assignment) in widespread use. The second source in the article only references snack bars in general, not a snack officer in particular. Further searches turn up nothing reliable. Writ Keeper (t + c) 17:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nothing to support notability. 99.137.210.226 (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A WP:NEO with very little usage based on searches in gbooks and gnews. (Snäckö OTOH could have an article) SmartSE (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Not an article, but a dab page. Come on SmartSE, don't be a hater of either Aland or Aboland. Drmies (talk) 18:27, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable subject -- complete lack of independent, reliable sources per WP:RS and WP:GNG.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - per WP:NEO and maybe even WP:NONSENSE, too. Malke 2010 (talk) 20:07, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect. There's no need to preserve the current material for attribution, because it's a neologism at best and nonsense at worst. The title, however, is a plausible search term and should redirect to Snäckö with Template:R from title without diacritics. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEO with no notability whatsoever, plus it was really a spam operation. The creator has already been indef'ed. § FreeRangeFrog  croak 21:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Cameron11598  (Converse) 22:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NEO. Though well known to Air Force personnel, its is not terribly encyclopedic.  EricSerge (talk) 00:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.