Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snak the Ripper (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Snak the Ripper
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Has been to AfD before, closed for no agreement. I can't find anything beyond hyper-local sources that would support keeping this. Not meeting general or musician notability guidelines. Also, no new sources have turned up since the last nomination for AfD. Oaktree b (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting. I'm wondering what has changed in the past 3 months since the last AFD. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 02:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * keep (per last AfD), subject charted on the Canadian Albums Chart with two different albums. Chart specifically listed at WP:GOODCHARTS. Subject passes WP:MUSICBIO. Mbdfar (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 04:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - GNG is met per my SA table made in the previous AfD, which took place just over 3 months prior to this. Such a quick re-nomination with no new substantive argument for deletion is disruptive and patrolling admins should consider a procedural close as such. &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  15:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I can't say yay or nay at this point since I haven't investigated the subject's notability yet. This would be the third AfD this subject is facing with the first one receiving strong support for deletion, and the recreation closing with "no consensus". An allegation of COI was made here and it is worth a look. COI Noticeboard regarding Snak the Ripper. Edit history and the discussion will reveal two obvious edit accounts showing strong indication of advocacy and public relations editing activity. Graywalls (talk) 22:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep I'm genuinely surprised this doesn't pass WP:GNG more "clearly" (in the sense we have to debate this), but after review I think the sources available (a multitude of Canadian coverage from around the country at different time frames) still pass WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  T · C  21:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.