Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snake PSA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Snake PSA

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Contested prod, reason was:

Only source is a link to another Wikipedia article, and that article just a list of episodes of a YouTube show. No evidence of notability.

I agree with this reasoning. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:00, 7 November 2010 (UTC) I, on the other hand, do not. For starters, The Nostalgia Critic is not a Youtube show. While other users on Youtube upload his episodes, he has his own website, which is the official home of the videos. Second, I posted some links that show mentions of the PSA on TV Tropes-not exactly reliable, but, you never know. Multiverseman (talk) 18:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete As WP:PRODer of this article. "Nostalgia Critic" and "TV Tropes" are in now way, shape, or form considered reliable sources with a reputation for fact checking. They are just TV fansites. Most individual television commercials are not notable unto themselves, and there is no evidence that this one is an exception t that. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. LOL! I remember this commercial! It used to scare me hehe. I don't think there's enough to warrant it's own separate article, but I do wish there was some kind of "List of PSA's" or something we could add this to.. of a type that would include a bit more encyclopedic prose than just a category listing, I mean.. -- &oelig; &trade; 10:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.