Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 19:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Snap Technologies
"Snap Technologies" CMS -wikipedia gets under 900 Googles, of which 132 unique Technologies%22 %2Bcms -wikipedia. Monograph of single purpose account. No evidence of meetign WP:SOFTWARE, some evidence of not meeting WP:CORP (private company, unstated size). Guy 21:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably doesn't meet WP:CORP. Website has an Alexa Web Traffic ranking of 482,389. -- Nish kid 64 01:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mango juice talk 15:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Stubbleboy 18:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Keep, giving TAG2010 benefit of the doubt and hoping to see future edits in other unrelated areas. JonHarder 00:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Do not delete, Keep TAG2010 14:33, 02 October 2006 (UTC) Given that I work for Snap Technologies and my opinion is only one of many, here are some relevant facts so the community can decide. WP:SOFTWARE Snap Technologies is one of only 29 vendors and the only CMS provider that has Authorized Preferred Vendor status with Sage_Software.  Sage Software chose Snap Technologies to provide the SnapTech CMS to over 3000 Sage Partners in North America.  Re: Google. Snap recently rebranded their name, logo, website, etc. so Google results declined as a result.  WP:CORP Re: Publications. The SnapTech Website Guide is widely distributed and is used as a resource by the American_Marketing_Association www.cville-ama.org/WebsiteGuide.pdf  As well, Snap Technologies will be profiled in an article on website productivity in the upcoming issue of Backbone Magazine [].  The content of the article is neutral and I believe it complies with Wikipedia criteria.  As far as being a single user account, I plead guilty (so far) but I intend to contribute more in the future.
 * Comment As a consensus when you don't want something deleted you call it "keep". Futhermore, you would know that had you not come here just to promote the company you work for by creating an article for them.  Stubbleboy 02:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a failure of WP:CORP; I am very tempted to apply the newly expanded spam speedy deleteion template.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.