Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snapshot (file format)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to SNP file format. Plausable enough, that we really shouldn't leave this redlinked Courcelles 05:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Snapshot (file format)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is basically a duplicate of SNP file format (and would also be an implausible redirect). The other article has more information (and was also created earlier), so it should be the one that remains. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 21:57, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 11 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Automatic  Strikeout   ( T  •  C ) 00:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 01:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TB randley  02:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the nom that this article duplicates SNP file format and that the latter article has more information and more secondary refs. --Mark viking (talk) 04:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely a less descriptive duplicate of SNP file format --Karverstudio (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.