Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sniagrab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JodyBtalk 17:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Sniagrab

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article fails to meet the GNG guidelines. This is a marketing campaign with only one mention in Google News and so fails to meet the "significant impact" that would be required to go beyond the press releases and their derivative advertorials to be expected with any such media campaign. Fæ (talk) 20:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 20:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Eteled per nom, absolutely no sources. So trivial it doesn't warrant a redirect to The Sports Authority. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nominator. TPH, I hope "delete" backwards doesn't mean keep. -    Hydroxonium (talk) 08:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete; I don't think it's notable. Maybe copy a few words into Sports Authority, but that's it.bobrayner (talk) 13:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not even close to being notable. Figureofnine (talk) 15:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.