Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snitching (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit  00:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Snitching (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails to meet WP: NSongs. Only presents one good source, Hot New Hip Hop. Times of India only mentions the video and cites the lyrics of the song. Entering charts doesn't mean a song is notable. The rest of the article is composed of album reviews and "self-interested parties" such as a manager and producers. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge/redierct to the album article Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon, not seeing anything myself (t &#183; c)  buidhe  01:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:35, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon - Coverage from album reviews should be condensed and incorporated in the Music and lyrics section of the album article. It does not contribute to the song meeting notability standards per WP:NSONG.--NØ 08:43, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: the story of the song's inspiration and it being passed on constitute notability, with the former having an independent source of the album, plus chart positions help pass the guideline somewhat too. --K. Peake 07:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * it's a brief mention that can be incorporated on the album article. Unlike "Gangstas" that makes several references to 6ix9ine as an inspiration. Nevertheless, I respect your opinion. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 08:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * WP:SNOW close due to being the same nonsensical nomination MarioSoulTruthFan has made to other song articles recently, which I have explained in his other Afds why they're nonsense. Speaking of which, he tried to do something similar with an article on a One Direction as notable as this one, and got his ass handed to him on a platter for a good reason. XD 👨x🐱 (talk) 22:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per there only being a few charts, although I disagree with MarioSoul on the significance of these kind of charts in general. 👨x🐱 (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ashley  yoursmile!  16:39, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sufficient coverage exists to justify a stand-alone article. "Charts indicate a song may be notable" heavily implies they should not be combined with the strictest possible interpretation of SIGCOV. Where obvious and unambiguous SIGCOV exists combined with enough borderline coverage to produce an article of good quality (I stand by my comments at the Moments AfD; NSONGS strictly interpreted is not our most glorious SNG), chart ranking should certainly be accepted to move borderline articles to confident keeps. Vaticidalprophet 19:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: I agreed with Vaticidalprophet on this. The song has charted in several charts, I don't see any the reason why the article need to be redirected. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon: does not fit into WP:NSONG CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.