Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snog (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 19:15, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Snog (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Incredibly old article (at least 2003), so I have mixed feelings here. The fact is that the article does nothing to establish the notability of the band. A metric ton of releases on non-notable labels, but no references to show notability, and nothing in the text to imply notability. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  15:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Aside from multiple releases on Metropolis Snog has recieved coverage in
 * Band has two notable members Pieter Bourke and David Thrussell (nominated for Best Original Soundtrack / Cast / Show Recording ARIA award)
 * David Thrussell also should be created. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Band has two notable members Pieter Bourke and David Thrussell (nominated for Best Original Soundtrack / Cast / Show Recording ARIA award)
 * David Thrussell also should be created. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Band has two notable members Pieter Bourke and David Thrussell (nominated for Best Original Soundtrack / Cast / Show Recording ARIA award)
 * David Thrussell also should be created. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * David Thrussell also should be created. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Add allmusic to the coverage, where three albums are reviewed. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep' band satisfies WP:Music and all it needs is suitable references to justify - agree that Thrussell should have own article. Dan arndt (talk) 10:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree it meets WP:Music #5 & #6 as mentioned above. I've started adding some inline references for it. Kathodonnell (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has sufficient RS  to  assert notability, but  needs a clean up  and some EL removing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per above keeps -- sufficient RS coverage.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:08, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I don't see why a band thats been around for as long as they have would be deleted. not only can their goods be purchased at retail stores, radio stations recieved copies of their albums in the late nineties and itunes still has multiple albums of theirs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.121.97 (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.