Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snookerpool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Snookerpool

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I'd Speedy delete this, but I can't find the correct reason (the original reason no longer applies.) Sigma 7 20:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: User:Kntrabssi attempted to Prod the article, but I already created the AFD page. --Sigma 7 20:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article is about a game that is not notable, and a quick Google search brings up no coherent results that show the game in current usage.  Notability is not a criteria for speedy deletion, so AfD is probably the best option.  Kntrabssi 20:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Violates WP:NOT] in that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. As far as Im aware this game does not exist outside someones home --PrincessBrat 20:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kntrabssi. Not notable and definitely not verifiable. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  21:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete searched Google as well and came back empty-handed. Agree with Kntrabssi on non-notability. HagenUK 21:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.