Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snooper (brand)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Snooper (brand)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable fgnievinski (talk) 05:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 05:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 05:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 05:55, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: User:Fmalina blanked the AfD along with removal of the AfD template from the page. I have left them a message to contribute here. Nightfury 11:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Removing banner, please read my contribution comments before dismissing or reverting my actions, the non notability comment of fgnievinski is insulting as is the banner that was displayed as a result of that action
 * Nightfury how dare your revert my changes with that patronising tone??
 * Delete While the somewhat generic name of this brand makes it more difficult to search, trying "snooper"+"GPS" or "snooper"+"radar" do not seem to help. Most articles seem to be retreads of PR releases. (see and . While the brand definitely exists, it has not received enough coverage to warrant its own article on WP. Angryapathy (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty much promotional WP:SPAM, if this was a new article I would of G11'ed it. Jumpytoo Talk 17:36, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not sure what guidelines cover a "brand" (as opposed to an organization or a product) but I believe the appropriate SNG is WP:NCORP. The references fails the requirements for establishing notabilty.  HighKing++ 13:26, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.