Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snoozy Choc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 03:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Snoozy Choc

 * - (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete - non-notable fictional beverage whose appearances are limited to a cartoon billboard and a deleted scene. Otto4711 01:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable cruft. Flakeloaf 01:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No attempt to comply with our WP:N or WP:V policies. No assertion of notability. No sources. --Shirahadasha 02:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no real-world notability established, fails WP:FICT. Shirahadasha, note that WP:N is a guideline, not policy. --Dhartung | Talk 04:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I love Aardman, but this is Wallace-and-Gromit-cruft at its finest. Sorry.  Lankiveil 04:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete for all the reasons previously stated. House of Scandal 08:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see the relevance in this article.  Telly   addict  12:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as trivia -- Whpq 15:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't even warrant mention within a Wallace and Gromit article.zadignose 17:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN and per nom. —dima/s-ko/ 20:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.