Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snorehole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete as per consensus. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Snorehole

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I dream of horses (T) @ 23:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism that belongs on the Urban Dictionary. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 23:22, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - In that I could not find even one reference in a creditable - 3rd party - reliable source - delete. However, I did want to say to the author; "...I like it".  Thanks for the chuckle (especially the snorehole deactivator - where do I get one). ShoesssS Talk 23:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yanno, I'm with you on the grin factor, and it's articles like this that should be enshrined in WP:BJAODN. Ah, if only it were still around. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 15:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The slang entry must go.  But there are 22 refs in Gbooks for the thing, it seems to be a hole in a mine pump, or a special air hole in a furnace.  Potential for an entry in Wikipedia, if nobody wants to do the work, I'd say delete without prejudice. Power.corrupts (talk) 14:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * comment - Nice catch there Power.corrupts. Not sure about here on Wikipedia.  But will do a quick write-up for Wiktionary, as there is no definition as of today.  Thanks again. ShoesssS Talk 14:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. If it means anything it doesn't mean what the article says it does, which means the article would have to be rewritten, which is a valid criteria for speedy deletion. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 17:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, mildly amusing neologism, doesn't meet our inclusion criteria though. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete - non-notable neologisms don't belong in Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.