Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowbagging


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 00:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Snowbagging
Discussion to run until at least 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Sourcing seems to be a problem at this time, and I'm not sure this activity (sport?) has caught on sufficiently to justify an article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--it doesn't appear to be very notable, and it certainly hasn't taken on in Alabama (why not???). Drmies (talk) 21:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete--it doesn't appear to be very notable, no, and some of the information is wrong. Snowbagging in Stockholm is not an usual or popular sport (can't find anything on it). I hate deleting things but I suspect that this is only Kenny’s friends~special amusement. I am sure it's great fun, even if it is not really encyclopaedical knowledge.... Warrington (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, but nice try lads. Utter nonsense. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as wikipedia is not for games invented by one's friends. Need non-trivial independant sources to become encylopedic, which don't exist, as it is to new and unpopular.Yobmod (talk) 10:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - while it can be verified, there is no evidence from reliable sources that it is notable. The burden is on the creators to find and fix it. Bearian (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:31, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Gsearch isn't coming up with this usage other than a couple of youtube videos; gnews isn't coming up with this usage at all.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.