Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowball (Novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 23:11, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Snowball (Novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another unremarkable Arabic novel. Part of a recent slough of these. References do not demonstrate notability. A loose necktie (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Morocco. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep of the two sources in the article, one is a full length review of the work while the other is an interview with the author about the work. In addition I have found another full length review in a mainstream publication here. Mccapra (talk) 19:51, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as the critical commentary is entirely unsourced, and the rest fails WP:PLOT. —   Fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124; 20:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Draftification? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify?. That's where, well, basically all the rest of these are. (ANI thread for context: .) If it's kept, I think it has to be stubbed. It looks strongly like "copyvio by translation" to me and it's not very helpful to readers in the first place. -- asilvering (talk) 05:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I would not object to draftification for improvement. Mccapra (talk) 05:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - with 2 sources being full reviews, this should be kept. Lovewiki106 (talk) 07:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BKCRIT reviewed. Lightburst (talk) 01:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.