Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowfall in Drybrook 2008/2009


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Snowfall in Drybrook 2008/2009
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This has been split out from the main article about Drybrook, but there is nothing notable about the snowfall in this or other periods. The PROD was contested. The article is verifiable form meteorological records but it is not notable Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If it hasn't snowed in Drybrook in more than 100 years, that can be mentioned in the article. However, this English town isn't exactly in the tropics. Mandsford (talk) 22:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable per WP:INDISCRIMINATE: Wikipedia is not for news reports. In the same vain, I believe this covers weather reports for a small area. This is of strictly local influence, plus it sounds as if a Chamber of Commerce wrote it, then again, maybe it is well-known for its white Christmases! Unlikely... and not notable. Scapler (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.