Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowmasters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed as speedy keep. Nom withdrawn. per improvements made by Grist. Dloh cierekim  00:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Snowmasters

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article reads like an advert, and it's sourced only by the company website. Accounting4taste had tagged for speedy deletion per WP:CSD_G11. I was searching for sourcing and notability, and the creator detagged. I found nothing at Forbes.com or Galenet. There are copious web hits that I've not sorted through so this is procedural, no vote. withdrawn  Dloh  cierekim  18:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable and sounds like advertising. Wikieditor06 (talk) 18:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Whether or not notable, it totally ignores wikipedia's manual of style and does not provide much useful information so anyone willing to write a proper article on that topic would have to start all over again. DubZog (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC) Weak Keep. Since the article has been completely rewritten, the only problem remaining seems to be the notability one, yet in my opinion it is not much of a problem in this case. DubZog (talk) 00:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Reference USA gives annual sales of $1million to $2.5 million. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  20:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Week keep. The article as it stood was actually a copyvio of this page, but I've rewritten it and added some reasonably good sources. Gr1st (talk) 22:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, great job on the rewrite. Seriously considering withdrawing the nom. Will see what others think.  Dloh  cierekim  22:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep based on Gr1st's improvements. Edward321 (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.