Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So, Meet You In Heaven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted. The article was deleted on 11:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC) under G7 speedy deletion criteria, by User:Olaf Davis. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 20:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

So, Meet You In Heaven

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article about a webnovel. I can not find any sources that discuss it. The only source on the article is the authors website, not third party sources. It is mostly a plot summary. GB fan 00:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - borderline advert without sourcing and no actual claim of notability.  Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  01:15, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable in-depth sources. Seems to be written for promotional purposes. Exeva (talk) 02:51, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete A Wattpad story? Yet another example of why we need a CSD criteria for this sort of drivel. Fails WP:NBOOK, WP:GNG, WP:NWEB, etc. etc.... Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 07:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero notability, only 9 hits in google, all of which are the wattpad site or this AfD.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:36, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely not notable.  WormTT   &middot; &#32;(talk) 12:41, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, please. Articles of this sort need a CSD criterion... Clearly not notable per WP:NBOOK. → B  music  ian  12:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, pretty much devoid of actual content. J I P  &#124; Talk 18:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: That was after the article creator decided to remove the plot summary constituting almost the entire article. Either way, I think the article should be deleted. J I P  &#124; Talk 18:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete — Not notable, as per WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG C(u)w(t)C(c) 23:31, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.