Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So Fresh: The H!ts of Summer 2011 + The Best of 2010


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

So Fresh: The H!ts of Summer 2011 + The Best of 2010

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This AfD discussion is intended to get a community consensus on this article and on the whole range of articles for other albums listed at So Fresh - I've chosen this one just as an example. I'm not personally asking for their deletion, but I was recently asked by another editor about creating some of the missing album articles, and I discovered that So Fresh: The Hits of Autumn 2011 was deleted as a result of WP:Articles for deletion/So Fresh: The Hits of Autumn 2011. It seems to me that either the whole series is notable, or the whole series is not notable, and they should either all be accepted or all deleted - it doesn't seem to make sense to me for individual notability to be needed on an album-by-album basis if the series itself is notable. So, opinions please. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to So Fresh. Without any reliable sources to show significant coverage of the album itself, the article as is is nothing more than a track list and should just be redirected to the main article. I would do the same for any others unless they can pass notability requirements for a stand-alone article. I have no problem with only a select few having their own articles as long as they meet WP:N and WP:NALBUMS, but most do not. The article on the series itself is in dire need of sourcing as well, however. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 23:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: compilation articles like this are rarely reviewed or attract much coverage. Nick-D (talk) 10:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've checked a few to see how many page hits they get. So Fresh: The Hits of Autumn 2012 is averaging about 50 a day, while the older So Fresh: The Hits of Winter 2004 is getting about 16 a day. I don't know if that's relevant, but seeing as I'd looked I thought I'd share it in case anyone is interested. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.