Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So Fresh: The Hits of Winter 2011


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:40, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

So Fresh: The Hits of Winter 2011

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable compilation album released on Australia. — ΛΧΣ  21™  03:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep being released in Australia is no reason to delete, nor is being a compilation album. The clue is that it is written on in independent sources, and is also part of a set, and should not be the odd one with no article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If no sources are available to make sure it meets WP:NALBUMS, then it may be deleted. — ΛΧΣ  21™  12:59, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Zero wp:notability-suitable references, zero indication of wp:notability. North8000 (talk) 14:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


 * keep. Platinum album. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Sources? — ΛΧΣ  21™  12:59, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * duffbeerforme (talk) 13:18, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. If you are able to find any chart position in Australia, it'll be great. — ΛΧΣ  21™  13:27, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, per link provided by User:Duffbeerforme. Information on chart position would be good, but I consider it unlikely it'd get to platinum without charting.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete What's there to write about compilation albums like this? I really doubt that this has ever been reviewed or received significant coverage, so notability isn't established. Nick-D (talk) 09:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per platinum certification. StAnselm (talk) 05:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Strange not to be able to show chart position, but reputable source for being a platinum seller. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:50, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The ARIA chart shows it made it to position 4 on compilation chart, so I have included a reference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.