Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sobrang Monastery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 21:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Sobrang Monastery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article lacks enough content to identify the context of the article. It only says "Sobrang Monastery is a Buddhist monastery in Bhutan.", then a few stub tags, then nothing else. The article does also not cite any sources. ToonLucas22 (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

EDIT: Oh geez, it looks like the article has been expanded since I tagged this for deletion. Looks like I have to withdraw this, though I had to tag the article with one source since almost all of it is seem to rely on the same source (except on the Festivals section, where 3 sources are linked to in a row). Anyone else before I get to withdraw this? --ToonLucas22 (talk</i>) 19:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 22:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 22:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a real place and apparently of some significance. There are even a couple of photos on Commons. As so often with this part of the world, the problem is primarily one of spelling; so many variations: Sobrang, Sombrang, Sumthrang ,etc. This seems to be the best source. Have expanded the article a little; more could be done if anyone feels so inclined. -Arb. (talk) 18:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Article has an interwiki link to RU
 * Keep. It's highly unlikely that a still extant 13th century monastery wouldn't be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Sufficient to pass WP:GEOFEAT criteria 2.--Antigng (talk) 14:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.