Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoccerProject (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 08:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

SoccerProject
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Niche browser game, very poorly referenced (mentions in passing/unreliable websites). No indication of reception/reviews/significance. Seems to fail Notability (video games) and WP:GNG in general. Previous AfD from 2008 ended as 'no consensus', which is telling given how inclusionist we were back then... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete how this article survived a deletion discussion is beyond me. Very crufty and notability isn't demonstrated. SportingFlyer  T · C  14:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I too am surprised this survived deletion. No notability is established by any of the sources used. Namcokid  47  16:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Primarily cites its own website as sources, while the others cited are not reliable. Traditional reliable sources have no results. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 16:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - survived previous discussion as guidelines like WP:GNG, WP:NWEB and WP:NVG were not enforced back in 2008. It fails those guidelines so there is no longer any reason to keep this article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Indeed. Sometimes I wonder if it would make sense to simply start checking all keeps from those years (let's say, pre 2010) and see what proportion got deleted (and would get deleted now...). Logic being, if something was bad enough to hit AfD then, it probably deserved it... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:54, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * - yeah, definitely. For footballers, a lot of the ones that scraped through then might actually pass more comfortably if their career did actually go anywhere but, certainly with things like companies, games, web content, films... If they scraped a 'no consensus' back in Wikipedia's dark days, it definitely raises the question as to whether they'll even survive 7 days of AfD now... Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Added to my to-do list. If only it wasn't backlogged to hell and beyond already... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * - anyone that ever says "I've finished my to-do list" is a liar Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 12:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't pass WP:GNG, non notable game/website. WikiVirusC (talk) 00:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - article just doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 01:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete  fails  WP:GNG  Devoke  water  11:18, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.