Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nominator doesn't make a policy-based argument for deletion, and appears to have nominated somewhat WP:POINTily. Also, WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 21:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Social (disambiguation)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

already another disambig page at social Bhny (talk) 12:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and revert Social: the only reason there are duplicate disambiguation pages is because you copied and pasted from Social (disambiguation) into Social. The correct way of handling this would have been to request a move.  Plus, at least three different editors have undone your changes to Social, and you have reverted each of their changes, which strongly suggests that there is no consensus for your preferred version of these pages. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 14:29, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and revert per Russ. bd2412  T 16:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. No reason not to keep social as it was before you changed it. In addition, the change to a disambig broke hundreds of inbound links that you didn't bother fixing, hence why I reverted. &mdash;Xezbeth (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 27.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  18:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This was just wrongheaded. social is the article with the severe problems, as some editors have pointed out on its talk page during the almost nine years of its existence.  This article is not the problem.  (I was going to say "perfectly fine", but it does seem to be disambiguating amongst things that apparently aren't called "a social"/"the social".  AFD is not Cleanup, of course; or even Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation.)  Don't go nominating social for deletion (for the second time in its history) just because I said it had severe problems, by the way.  Talk:social does give an interesting pointer, if one reads it beyond the first section.  Uncle G (talk) 19:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * keep and come to consensus on the talk page of what should be done with these two; nominating this for deletion now seems a bit early, especially in the midst of edit-warring. --KarlB (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.