Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Kinnect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Social Kinnect

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. Most of the citations are to press release hostings or blog-type sites of doubtful WP:RS status. Two cites to ighthouseinsights.in are possible RS but purely promotional. WP:BEFORE finds only more WP:ROUTINE coverage of marketing agency. Very close to CSD#G11 territory. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 13:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with nom except for one thing: it is in G11 territory. Bri (talk) 14:35, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bri and G11. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 20:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Most of the citations to press release hostings or blog-type sites of doubtful WP:RS status are removed. Two cites to ighthouseinsights.in are also removed. Kalpeshchatterjee (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Oddly enough, this does not improve the article. The two Lighthouseinsights.in articles were the only WP:RS apparently available.  The article is now sourced to just a self-cite and a press release.  This makes it look like it has even less chance of demonstrating notability.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. I've removed puffery and obvious promotional content from the article. -- HighKing ++ 16:59, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.