Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Life (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Devorah Rose.  MBisanz  talk 17:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Social Life (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was speedy deleted under WP:CSD (unambiguous promotion) then immediately recreated by the author as less promotional. The concern here is that while it contains assertions of significance, the three sources given do not suggest significant coverage; one is from the magazine itself and the others appear to have no relation to the subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Related article by the same author: Devorah Rose, editor of Social Life Magazine. That one may be OK, although there's a WP:NOTINHERITED issue with that article or this one. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * This Wikipedia article is as important as the following Wikipedia articles that have already been accepted. I will work on adding additional links, but I firmly believe this article is worthy of being included on Wikipedia. Thank you.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamptons_(magazine)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotham_(magazine) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seablue33 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Your belief, as the article's author with an apparent conflict of interest (based on your contributions) doesn't have any grounding in Wikipedia policy. WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a real argument to keep. Each article stands or fails on its own merits, independent of others. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:23, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Devorah Rose, there are sources like this, but the majority of the reliable sources are about the editor in chief Devorah Rose rather than the magazine itself. Nimuaq (talk) 12:03, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.