Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Repose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  06:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Social_Repose
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are no references in existence anywhere in sources of reputable calibre to demonstrate the subject has sufficient notability to be included in an encyclopedia. This is because he doesn't. SatansFeminist (talk) 14:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Very weak sourcing. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. -The Gnome (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. I believe the coverage in secondary news sources is out there; what's on the article is okay and indicates notability but sure, it could be better.  Ss  112   13:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep plenty of coverage as seen here. Not sure why the weird underline is included in the title of the nom? Is it in the article too? Needs to be removed before looking for sources covering this subject. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:30, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:02, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.