Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Research and Action Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. North America1000 15:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Social Research and Action Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per source searches, does not meet WP:ORGDEPTH. North America1000 09:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 09:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Vote retain: Search of the translated article under its french name, Centre de recherche et d'action sociales, produces additional results which seem to me to satisfy the criterion of Deep coverage: "provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond routine announcements and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub". Also, it meets the audience criterion with coverage which is national. The independence of sources criterion seems to be satisfied by references which show inclusion in independently published books as well as in several of the footnotes which satisfy the independent source criterion. Since English is the most commonly spoken language worldwide, I think that this article on a notable French NGO deserves to be translated into the English Wikipedia. Jzsj (talk) 12:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment – Source searches under "Centre de recherche et d'action sociales" are only providing passing mentions. See below. North America1000 12:43, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Please check all my latest additions. I don't know about the search engine (is it the main criterion for all notable articles?) but would none of these qualify:, , published book quoted in , a much more detailed history of the center carried in an independent source, the annual, four-day conference carried on the Catholic schools' website, , an independent commendation of its website, the prominence given to its editorializing in an independent journal, . And what of the two works quoted in the original French article (and included in my references)? Jzsj (talk) 14:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Please check all my latest additions. I don't know about the search engine (is it the main criterion for all notable articles?) but would none of these qualify:, , published book quoted in , a much more detailed history of the center carried in an independent source, the annual, four-day conference carried on the Catholic schools' website, , an independent commendation of its website, the prominence given to its editorializing in an independent journal, . And what of the two works quoted in the original French article (and included in my references)? Jzsj (talk) 14:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.