Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Sciences Research Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete by majority consensus. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:36, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Social Sciences Research Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 01:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as rather advertorial with there then also not being anything for actual independent notability and substance, I'm not finding sufficiently better than mentions. SwisterTwister   talk  04:56, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes the article is too short. But other than that, there is nothing wrong with the article. If the society is a non profit society as the article claims, it can't be advertorial.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:00, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I did not nominate it as it is a short article. I did because it doesn't have citations for the information presented. My searches also didn't any reliable sources. It clearly fails WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 10:08, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO on an apparently unremarkable organisation. Appears to be part of the walled garden around Coşkun Can Aktan, whose page the article creator (Special:Contributions/SERDAR_YAY) has significantly expanded. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:57, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion per WP:PROMO. There is no indication of significance or notability due to a lack of coverage in independent reliable sources - topic fails WP:ORG and GNG. Also, this may be WP:TOOSOON for this topic - revisit in a couple of years. Steve Quinn (talk) 02:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.