Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social dreaming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. (non-admin closure) Finalnight (talk) 18:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Social dreaming

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable original research. All of the sources cited are from one author.  TN ‑ X - Man  20:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep-I'm currently helping the author find some web refs. And besides, does it even matter if all the works cited are are cited by the author? -- G2.0 USA contributions 20:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Er, yes, wouldn't that be original research? – ukexpat (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC) Oops I thought you meant all the refs were by the creator of the article. – ukexpat (talk) 21:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article needs a lot of work, but the subject is notable enough. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 21:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I am in agreement with the other affirmative-minded editors on this. A rewrite is needed, to be certain, but the subject appears to have a valid notability. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment -- Sounds like BS, but apparently there are many books by multiple authors talking about it: . --Itub (talk) 07:22, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Also needs some links and an image illustrating the process of social dreaming. -- G2.0 USA contributions 20:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.