Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social media and dark traits, depression, and suicide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Social media and dark traits, depression, and suicide

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Clearly falls under WP:NOTESSAY, reads like a literature review. PROD removed by author without comment. Previously speedied as a test page by User:Exemplo347, which I contested once author started adding content. RA 0808 talkcontribs 19:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 19:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 19:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - As above - this is just a review of an article Exemplo347 (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. The nomination says "Clearly falls under WP:NOTESSAY", and that just about sums it up. It is a subjective essay, reviewing a research paper and expressing the author's personal opinions, not an objective encyclopaedia article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY/WP:NOTJOURNAL. The topic of using social media to track/predict mental illness could be notable, if all the references weren't primary sources. Joe Roe (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY/WP:NOTJOURNAL the topic itself could be mentioned in Social Media if more secondary sources can be found Morganglick (talk) 21:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I still don't understand why WP:NOTESSAY does not qualify for speedy delete. —Мандичка YO 😜 21:55, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Snow delete per WP:NOTESSAY and above. This is obviously never going to survive so I don't see why we need to go the whole hog, even if a PROD has been contested. Adam9007 (talk) 00:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - bears no relevance to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droopdead (talk • contribs) 11:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.