Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social media downfalls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Social media downfalls

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Content fork of Social media which reads like an essay and appears to contain mainly original research. Contested PROD. Part of the information could perhaps be merged into Social media, but both the title and the content of the article are fundamentally POV and seem unsalvageable to me. bonadea contributions talk 11:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. -Cntras (talk) 11:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - definitely an essay, definitely POV. Lunaibis 11:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NPOV Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 13:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Remember, people: making a Facebook account is the Fatal Glass of Beer. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced POV essay. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: Essay. SL93 (talk) 23:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Written in an essay format from the author's point of view, like an opinion piece. Northamerica1000 (talk) 15:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsourced original essay. Carrite (talk) 08:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Note that the article does have three references, but the current state of the article appears to be too biased to be salvageable. Is it possible that it could be speedily deleted per criterion G11 because it heavily promotes the idea that social media is a negative thing? Chris the Paleontologist  (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.