Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social production of habitat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) JTZegers Speak Aura 15:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Social production of habitat

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is being nominated for two reasons: 1. The SINGLE source may not be good enough to make this article WP:NOTEWORTHY-It's just talking about apartments, not everything else. 2. This article reads more like a personal essay than a wikipedia article. JTZegers Speak Aura 14:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Seriously, you need to do some WP:BEFORE prior to firing these off. The term is common in the scientific literature and in textbooks. That these sources are missing from the article is not an argument for deletion, merely for improving the article. - As for the "essay" tag, I don't know what that is doing there; the text is actually a reasonable, if unsourced, factual summary in neutral style. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  20:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.