Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social verbs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Social verbs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It is an interesting concept, but I cannot find any good references, and as such it seems to fail WP:NOR and WP:N, not to mention WP:V. I''ve found it vageuly defined only in one book (which I've added), I couldn't find anything more substantial on GBooks or GScholar. Unless someone can find better refs, I am afraid this fails to raise to treshold of being worthy of an encyclopedic article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - this is more of a glossary entry than an article, so it fails WP:NOT.--greenrd (talk) 23:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned above, more like a dictionary/glossary definition than anything else. Delete per WP:NOT. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.