Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social viewing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nomination's complaint that the topic is not notable has been disproved by respectable scholarly examples. The complaint of ambiguity is not accepted as a reason to delete. Further discussion does not seem needed to reinforce these points. (non-admin closure) Andrew🐉(talk) 19:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Social viewing

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Ambiguous term, not a notable concept. Boleyn (talk) 12:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep has several hits in scholar. Some notable uses of the term include The Influence of “Social Viewing” on Televised Debate Viewers’ Political Judgment (Hahn et al), Livestreaming vs pre-recorded: How social viewing strategies impact consumers’ viewing experiences and behavioral intentions (Ang et al), and Social viewing behavior in social TV: proposing a new concept of socio-usability (Shin and Kim). Based on the articles as a whole, it seems to be a popular term for study in South Korea. The article in its current state does need WP:ATD-E though. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep a new and notable concept, ambiguous terminology or not. Definitely could be improved, though. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.