Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialbakers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Socialbakers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no indication of multiple reliable independent secondary sources discussing this company in significant detail and is thus not-notable per WP:NCORP. Even if it is notable (which again I see no indication from looking for sources that it is) this page should be TNT'ed given it's borderline G11 status. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The article should be definitely thoroughly rewritten using secondary sources, and shortened as well. However my opinion is that the subject is still notable enough to be on Wikipedia. - Darwinek (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I am not debating its borderline-G11 status and its over-reliance on primary sources, but I'm seeing enough significant references to convince me that it is a notable company. Beyond the references to the company itself, ABC News and the Wall Street Journal are publishing articles that appear to be solely based on results from Socialbakers analytics.  C Thomas3   (talk) 22:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:10, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep The company has over 3K mentions on Google Books. --Gprscrippers (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.