Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialblood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Socialblood

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can't find enough significant, third-party coverage to establish notability for this company. There's lots of churnalism and press releases but very little of substance.

The app appears to have been defunct for a little while, though the founders recently pledged to get it back up and running. This doesn't impact notability but may be of relevance to those looking for sources. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, Companies, Technology,  and India. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 14:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - What little I could find about this app and/or the company behind it is not reliable sourcing (the line between the app and the group behind the app is often blurred in sources such as this, which I want to stress is a contributor piece which wouldn't be a reliable source even if it wasn't written by Socialblood's founder, but it's non-independent anyways so the point is moot). Outside of database listings (usually pulling directly from app APIs with no context) and a sprinkle of funding mentions, there's no coverage of this application in reliable sources that are independent of the subject; it fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. - Aoidh (talk) 01:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.