Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialism and Gold


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 03:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Socialism and Gold
Attempt at an original synthesis. Brian G. Crawford 02:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. &mdash; AKADriver &#x260E;  03:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:OR --Deville (Talk) 03:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No original research.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   05:53, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Bronks
 * Delete, original research, unverifiable. --Ter e nce Ong 13:12, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete but seriously, I'd love to see some more citations so I could vote keep. Good article. Sadly, does currently fail OR.Colon el Tom 13:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Unsourced, appears to be original research and reads partly (not wholly) like an economics essay. I will change my 'vote' if some sources are put in the artcle. Robin Johnson 13:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It needs to be worked over, but it is wrong to say that it is unsourced, there is reference to the writings of Lenin and the other guy. Skalle 15:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete in the style of Colonel Tom unless someone can turn it into an encyclopedia article instead of an essay. NoIdeaNick 15:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per others. --Ginkgo100 17:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, same reasons as above Smilingman 22:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's more about public toilets than anything else --Nydas 12:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete as above, but I did like the editorial comment about public lavatories ;-) Pete.Hurd 02:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.