Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialism with a Northern Accent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 16:16, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Socialism with a Northern Accent

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 13:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The article contains four sources:      The Independent Labour Publications article might not be reliable but the other three are. There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Socialism with a Northern Accent to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)</li></ul>
 * The book passes Notability (books), which says: "A book is notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria: 1. The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. ..." Cunard (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Given the significant coverage in the reviews found by Cunard, which establishes notability. Davewild (talk) 09:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawen my error, Boleyn (talk) 09:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.