Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Creative Anachronism Peerages


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 23:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Society for Creative Anachronism Peerages

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

6 years since creation, has no references, no indication that the SCA peerage has any attention outside of SCA itself. WP has no interest in documenting the trivialities of a private organization, unless those trivialities gain attention outside the group, Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Although a Google news search shows a few passing mentions in articles on SCA, the peerage system does not have the in-depth coverage required for a Wikipedia article. Peerages are already briefly covered in the main article Society for Creative Anachronism. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:18, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete not recognised outside the SCA and too trivial to merge, existing coverage in the main article is just fine. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No notability; these titles are not recognized and have no meaning outside of the SCA itself. I considered a redirect, but IMO it would serve no purpose, since the search term "Society for Creative Anachronism Peerages" provides nothing that wouldn't be found via the search term "Society for Creative Anachronism". --MelanieN (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.