Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of Biblical Literature

Society of Biblical Literature was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was

Society of Biblical Literature
"Personal essay" would be euphemistic. SWAdair | Talk 09:04, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * "Unformatted, unreadable rant" would be more descriptive. Delete. &#8212;No-One Jones (m) 09:08, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Personal essay. --*drew 09:20, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete-GAAAHHHH ,save us from from the fires of hell this rant.--Jondel 09:34, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, one of the best efforts at making a truly bad page I've seen. Probably violates ever criteria in the book! Shane King 12:57, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * Original essay bordering on patent nonsense. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 15:49, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, but preserve on BJAODN - this is one of the funniest things I've ever read (either the author is totally insane, or it's an insanely clever ad for peoplemeet.com) -- Ferkelparade &pi; 19:11, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsensical rant. Would this be eligible as a speedy delete? Fire Star 21:20, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. What the hell? Gamaliel 02:04, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete User ought to be put on moderation and/or banned for it as well--Josiah 02:36, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, Speedy if possible. Inky 03:17, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. And I agree with Mike Rosoft that it borders on patent nonsense. Isn't there a way we can do what needs to be done without mocking the author? My (completely subjective) perception is that the author is a well-meaning, sincere individual who is trying to communicate something of importance to himself. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for sharing unorthodox personal visions, however. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 03:33, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: You can be full of wikilove, but I want to show this guy's article to every proponent of the 2nd Amendment in the US. Geogre 04:44, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I started reading it, but it ended up being a slab of text.  Funny, while it was at it. - Vague Rant 06:07, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is amazing, please move to "Well-Intended Essays and Other Deleted Nonsense" Ashibaka &#9998; 20:22, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg 03:23, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: personal essay / seizure inducing. -- WOT 22:38, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wow.  When I first saw this, I assumed it was vandalism and checked the history.  But no such luck.  --L33tminion | (talk) 20:34, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.