Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of Kabalarians of Canada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Disregarding the contributions of Kimberlyess, who is not only an SPA but who does not cite any policy-related rationale, we are left with a (defensible) claim of notability by Exit2DOS2000. While this claim is, as I said, defensive, this discussion suggests to me that the other users have evaluated and rejected it. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Society of Kabalarians of Canada

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nothing to indicate that this group/business is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Keep - this is a business that people should be able to reference in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimberlyess (talk • contribs) 06:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * undecided - possibly notable religious group see here here and (for a leagal first) here Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  02:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep im thinking that the events surrounding this 'abuse of position' charges brough this group into notability. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  02:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Likely SPA.  The above user has made no other contributions to Wikipedia as of the dating of this comment. MSJapan (talk) 04:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - The legal item is WP:BLP1E, as it was the leader and not the group that was on trial. Other than that, it's a fringe claim, and I don't see how this is anytrhing other than advertising of a sense. MSJapan (talk) 04:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, can't find anything to support notability of the organization, and the sources/references are pretty trivial. --MCB (talk) 05:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.