Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of the Seven (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 06:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Society of the Seven
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability not established, no references, previously deleted. Yellowspacehopper (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-Notable.-- RyRy5 ( talk  ♠  wikify ) 20:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt It's been recreated and deleted more than once. Not sourced, not finding anything on google. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources found; no references in the article to verify that the society even exists. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - previously deleted article now re-created without any sourcing or clear evidence of notability. If this keeps happening, we may have to salt it.  ◄   Zahakiel   ►  23:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Society of Seven, a legitimate unrelated article about a notable entertainment troupe. Maybe that will help prevent re-creation, plus some readers looking for Society of Seven might garble the name. JamesMLane t c 00:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment No evidence that Society of Seven has ever been called Society of the Seven so I don't really agree with redirecting. I think it would be better to delete and salt.Yellowspacehopper (talk) 03:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not suggesting that the Society of Seven has ever been called Society of the Seven, but merely that some reader might make that mistake. That's why Barak Obama redirects to Barack Obama -- we try to be helpful to our readers, even the sloppy ones. JamesMLane t c 05:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources.-- danntm T C 21:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources. Artichoke2020 (talk) 22:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I suppose, unless someone finds secondary sources. Gimghoul28 (talk) 20:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.