Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socklessness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''Remember that episode of Simpsons wherein Chief Wiggum described a fleeing suspect as "hatless"? Yeah. Delete.''' DS 22:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Socklessness
Though it was double prodded before, this article has not generated a single reference to show that is a notable cultural phenomenon. This belongs in Wikitionary, not here. If this is acceptable, then why not have articles on bralessness, hatlessness, ankle-braceletlessness, and countless others? Dar-Ape 01:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per nom. I'm surprised there's no reference to Einstein, a notorious non-sock-wearer, but I doubt that would be sufficient to bring it into notability. Tevildo 01:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If really necessary, couldn't particularly notable non-sock-wearers just be included in the sock article? Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  01:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. The state of being sockless is not a phenomenon and none of the specific examples referred to here have verification - it's just an editor's musings on what s/he feels to be a phenomenon ("I've seen a bunch of ads with sockless models.")  The article's title is a giveaway that it's just a pared down original essay. -- Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 05:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. J I P  | Talk 05:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete My personal motto is "Wear Two Socks for Duty, No Socks for Pleasure... but One Sock Only for Ecstasy". Unverifiable article. No, does not belong in Wikitionary either Bwithh 10:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable and OR. Thank you for the visual, Bwithh. -- Charlene 13:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. —  Brother  Flounder  (aka DiegoTehMexican) 17:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete--Rudjek 19:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Any worthy information about fashion trends in sock-wearing, if properly cited, might well be merged to Sock. Coemgenus 20:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.